Respondents multi-selected between 6 choices to identify the main motivation for starting a data transparency initiative. Results can be grouped by country, type of government org and role of respondent. Choices included "no initiative" to account for those who did not have one.

Percentage of respondents, in each level of government, who chose a specific obstacle as the main challenge to data transparency/ open data.

Developers were asked" "Which of these categories of data are important to you?" - these are their ranked choices, based on the % of developers who selected each category. (Note: the same categories of data were rated by citizens and government stakeholders)

Ranked categories of data based on citizen survey respondents' rating of what they deem important to publish. Results are sorted based on what is "Most Important". Results are presented for all segments in the citizen survey respondents.

Ranked categories of data based on government respondents' rating of what is important to publish. Results are presented in terms of %, for all types of government combined.

Ranked categories of data based on government respondents' rating of what is important to publish. Results are presented in terms of %, for all types of government combined.

Respondents were asked to select only one option from a list of different data consumption options for citizens. The results are shown by % of respondents for each choice, for all government types (Federal, State and Local).

Developers were asked: "Is the government data you're looking for generally available?"

Developers were asked: "How do you plan to fund application development and maintenance?"

All government respondents were asked to state to what extent they agree or disagree with 9 statements about Open Data/ Open Gov.
Responses are broken down by type of government.